The unsung heroes of horror: why practical effects still matter in today's CGI-driven world

The unsung heroes of horror: why practical effects still matter in today's CGI-driven world
In an age where computer-generated imagery (CGI) dominates the blockbuster scene, one might think that the tactile allure of practical effects has been relegated to the annals of filmmaking history. Yet, a surprising number of filmmakers are now returning to these traditional techniques to breathe life—literally and figuratively—into their cinematic visions. The resurgence of practical effects has once again highlighted their significant contribution to storytelling, particularly in the horror genre, where a tangible menace can make all the difference between cheap jump scares and genuine fear.

For many directors, CGI offers a digital canvas where imagination knows no bounds. However, this freedom often comes at the cost of realism and believability. Take, for example, John Carpenter's 1982 classic, "The Thing," renowned for its grotesque and immersive creature effects. The film remains a benchmark in horror, with practical effects that still horrify and amaze audiences today. The use of tangible models and prosthetics allowed actors to interact with physical entities, creating a palpable sense of terror that CGI often struggles to replicate.

As studios chase the next big visual spectacle, a counter-movement has been gaining traction. Filmmakers like Christopher Nolan and Quentin Tarantino have vocally supported the return to practical effects, citing how these techniques foster a more authentic and engaging film experience. Nolan, known for his meticulous attention to detail, used actual aircraft models and explosions in "Dunkirk," emphasizing the raw power of reality over digital simulations.

Recent horror titles such as Ari Aster's "Hereditary" and Robert Eggers' "The Lighthouse" have embraced this ethos. By employing practical effects, these films crafted an immersive atmosphere that unsettled audiences without the need for digital trickery. The lifelike presence of practical effects, often combined with intense performances, allows for a more intimate connection with the source of fear, making the horror element more relatable and effective.

From a production standpoint, practical effects also bring a certain tangible magic to the set, igniting creativity and spontaneity among the cast and crew. Unlike CGI, which is often added in post-production, practical effects are present during filming, resulting in genuine reactions from actors and frequently leading to unscripted moments of brilliance. Directors report that the limitations posed by practical effects can often inspire unique solutions and a more authentic storytelling approach.

Moreover, audiences have grown savvier in identifying CGI, which risks breaking the suspension of disbelief. There's something inherently nostalgic and gratifying about knowing the creature looming on screen is somehow real, created by dedicated artists who spent countless hours sculpting, painting, and animating without the assistance of pixels. This appreciation has also spurred a renewed interest in the craft of movie-making, with behind-the-scenes footage of practical effects gaining traction online as audiences yearn for the artistry of cinema's yesteryears.

The blend of practical effects with CGI is also paving new paths for filmmakers. When used judiciously, CGI can enhance practical effects rather than overshadow them. This hybrid approach leverages the strengths of both techniques, creating more seamless and captivating visual narratives. Legendary filmmakers like Guillermo del Toro have mastered this balance; films like "Pan's Labyrinth" and "The Shape of Water" have won accolades not only for their stories but for their stunning visual execution, where digital and practical effects harmoniously coexist.

In essence, practical effects remain an enduring facet of cinema because they offer something CGI consistently struggles to provide—a texture, weight, and sense of reality that digital creations, no matter how sophisticated, usually lack. While CGI continues to evolve and push boundaries, the demand for practical effects highlights a timeless appreciation for the tangible and the tactile, reminding us of cinema's foundational allure: the magical illusion of reality.

The recent resurgence of practical effects in horror and beyond speaks to a broader cultural desire to connect with stories on a tactile level. It's a testament to the enduring power of hands-on craftsmanship in an increasingly digital world—a reminder that sometimes, what’s old becomes new again.

Subscribe for free

You will have access to exclusive content such as discounts and special promotions of the content you choose:

Tags

  • practical effects
  • Cinema
  • Horror
  • CGI
  • Filmmaking